Netbooks - initial hardware housekeeping issues

I have been using Psion and Palm pocket computers extensively for some years to place computer assistance in the hands of primary pupils “doing science” outside the classroom. Given a trial set of “Classmate” Asus EEE PC subnotebooks (or “netbooks”) for a month, my first concern was not their capability (obviously greater, and to be dealt with in another post) but how far they could replace their smaller equivalents in the same rôle. The two crucial issues, with small children, are portability and survivability.

Portability is a relative term. Many of the boys to whom I loan a palmtop machine simply put it in their trouser pocket. Girls, on the other hand, usually put it in a school bag along with their books and so on. These Asus machines are about twice the size of a Psion, four times that of a Palm device. That makes them unpocketable, but doesn’t much affect a school bag. For boys, then, a change in behaviour is often necessary for these machines to be considered “portable”, but not for most girls.

For that reason, I loaned all five machines out to boys on 24 hour tickets in the first week just to see what would happen. In most cases, they went into sports bags (and came bag muddy) or satchels (and came back covered in grey fluff). In a significant minority (15%) of cases they were carried around continually in the hand, which places them at considerably greater risk (but see below on survivability).

After the first week they were loaned as required, regardless of gender or time span; as expected, the girls treated them exactly as if they were palmtops.

Survivability was more worrying, and I asked how much risk was acceptable in field trialling. The answer back from the sponsor was that deliberate attempts to test a machine to destruction would be unacceptable, but that we shouldn’t let potential hazard stop us from doing things we would do with a palmtop. It happened that a joint maths/sport project was under way, so the trial subnotebooks were added to the stock of Psions and Palms and allowed to go out onto football and netball pitches.

A football pitch provided the severest test of survivability. A pupil took one of the netbooks down to a practice game to try out both real time analysis of game descriptors entered into a spreadsheet (OpenOffice Calc, saving in Excel file format) and video capture to disk using the built in camera. The computer’s novelty attracted a lot of attention and it wasn’t long before attempts were made to take it away from its guardian, who resisted. In the resulting mêlée the computer was dropped, trampled on by several sets of studded boots and rolled over by half a dozen tussling nine year old boys. When order had been restored, the referee had to dig it out of the mud. Cleaning the mud out of USB ports, Ethernet socket, VGA output connector, sound jacks and, worst of all, the keyboard, took a lot of time, patience and cocktail sticks but, miraculously, everything was still in perfect working order. After that, we sealed all orifices with electrical insulating tape unless they were needed for use; proper sealing plugs would be better still, but would probably get lost fairly quickly.

Fast forward: despite horror stories like this, and my gut feeling that these machines are not ultimately as robust as handhelds, none came to grief in the time we had them.

My summary judgement: these are a valuable addition to the portable computing options available for primary science. Since Psion type machines are no longer made, and can only be replaced second hand, their gradual replacement on failure by these small subnotebooks seems a good strategy. At the same time, it would be a mistake to withdraw a working handheld (especially of the palm type). For as long as possible, keep existing palmtop hardware in use but expand enthusiastically with subnotebooks.

[Contributed by Chandra]

Experiments with a one-per-student computer

Asus’ EEE PC, though useful in many other areas (see more extensive review here), is a computer designed specifically for education. A wireless platform cheap enough, light enough, robust enough, small enough and powerful enough to be seriously proposed as a go anywhere, work anywhere, one per child point of wireless entry into a networked school system. We don’t know whether this vision is about to become reality at this moment, but we don’t doubt that it will come about in time – and the EEE PC is certainly closer than anything else we have seen to the keystone which would make it possible.

Over the past few months we have been sharing a set of these machines, moving them around different groups for a week or two at time and comparing notes on the results.

The machine is small enough to just about go into a handbag, as some of our young female teenage students demonstrated, is big enough for adapted touch typing after some practice, has on board wireless or wired network connectivity, is provided with three USB ports plus microphone/headphone jacks and is remarkable resilient.

Prices start at £167 (about $300 or €230 at time of writing), although the the ones we used were those with two or four megabytes of storage at £220 or £250 respectively ($400/€300 or $450/€340). Each machine in our set was also provided with a one gigabyte SD/MMC card, on which the default documents folder was configured to reside.

Despite some remarkably rough treatment, the complete set survived and were returned to the supplier in full working order.

That’s it for now. We will follow up with individual posts on our separate experiences over the trial period.

[Contributed by Chandra on behalf of the whole trial group]

Muzak to math by (2): the mourning after the note before

In November, we said that we were about to try a series of “Music and Maths” sessions aimed at 16-19 year old students, to culminate in a public performance.

We were looking for a program which would “listen” to a note and report its frequency, and at the time didn’t find one - though we have, with many thanks to Steven Pon who wrote in response to the original post, since discovered WavePort, from PASCO Scientific.

We ran a pilot with individuals, audibly matching frequency generated from a PC to plucked strings and pressed electronic organ keys, and got surprisingly good results with very close approximations to the theoretical curves. Unfortunately, when we extended this to a class it was much less successful.

We split the class into two groups, one with a guitar and one with an electronic organ, and set them to matching frequency to note in the same way, discussing amongst themselves the best match and coming to a consensus on the value to be entered into a spreadsheet log. For some reason, the results did not even remotely resemble the pilot with individuals. Some results followed the theoretical curve; some were completely out (including, interestingly, some which were almost exactly one octave adrift) and others which perversely followed a sequence in the wrong direction!

We’ve dropped the idea for the time being, pending more thought and trialling. On the positive side, however, we learnt  a lot - and the students were very coöperative in trying to make the experiment work. We’ll be back to it in due course.

[contributed by Ivor McGillivray and Felix Grant]

After time of drought and famine…

For a wide variety of reasons (most of them educational!), the education pages have been quiet over the past few months.

Things are coming together again, however, and I hope that things will be busier  from April 21st (when most Spring breaks end) onward.